FROM EVERYDAY CHALLENGES TO PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS
What you may be experiencing
- Governance pressure to prove fair, consistent misconduct handling, yet originality checks and policy evidence sit in separate systems, making oversight hard.
- Privacy and GDPR concerns around where data lives, how sources are shared, and whether staff can control inclusion/exclusion transparently.
- Limited tools to curate the institutional source pool (archives, URLs, ad‑hoc documents), so administrators struggle to keep checks relevant to local programmes.
How WISEflow Originality responds in practice
- Administrator‑level oversight with a dashboard to manage users and sources, upload ad‑hoc material, and audit activity, keeping control with the license team.
- Privacy‑by‑design with sharing groups and EU‑centric data handling (DPIA) that let institutions decide exactly what is scanned and shared, and with whom.
- Simple curation of sources: add institutional archives or specific web URLs; index them for screening and generate reports. All controlled in one place.
FROM EVERYDAY CHALLENGES TO PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS
What you may be experiencing
- Opaque percentage scores and long reports slow marking; assessors need clear match signals and contextual guidance, not just raw numbers.
- Constant context‑switching between platforms to view similarity undermines efficiency and increases error risk in high‑volume marking windows.
- False positives and noise (references, bibliographies, boilerplate) make it hard to judge significance confidently and fairly.
How WISEflow Originality responds in practice
- Embedded report overlay inside WISEflow’s marking tool, toggle on/off, navigate matches alongside the submission, no tab‑hopping required.
- Intuitive match categories (Exact, Strong, Potential) and quick guides that summarise sources, highlight sentence‑level evidence, and support faster, consistent judgement.
- Sensible exclusions and traceability: references/bibliographies can be excluded, with full IDs and metadata for auditing decisions.
FROM EVERYDAY CHALLENGES TO PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS
What you may be experiencing
- Traditional text‑matching misses common misconduct patterns such as paraphrasing or “translate‑and‑submit”, especially across languages.
- Student‑to‑student copying (within or across cohorts) is hard to detect if repositories don’t include prior submissions or cross‑institutional sharing.
- Reports can be biased when two papers submitted around the same time only flag one as “original” and the other as “copied”.
How WISEflow Originality responds in practice
- Semantic similarity powered by AI flags paraphrase and nuanced similarity, with cross‑language capability across 50+ languages.
- Rich source pools: institutional archives, open internet and sharing groups to surface student‑to‑student overlap across flows and institutions.
- Parallel analysis and dynamic two‑way checks designed to avoid “who‑submitted‑first” bias in same‑day submissions.
FROM EVERYDAY CHALLENGES TO PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS
What you may be experiencing
- Originality tools outside the assessment platform add setup friction and complicate authentication, user management and support.
- LMS/VLE workflows need originality checks without rebuilding institutional integrations or processes.
- Administrators want an onboarding path with clear roles, test environments and staged enablement across existing flows.
How WISEflow Originality responds in practice
- Works embedded in WISEflow or stand‑alone via public API and dashboards, SSO and role‑based access align with your existing identity strategy.
- API‑first and LTI‑friendly approach enables connectors to LMS/VLEs; institutions choose direct integration or a central ESB pattern.
- Proven onboarding plan with enablement steps, staging/tests and guidance on module activation across new and legacy marking tools.
FROM EVERYDAY CHALLENGES TO PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS
What you may be experiencing
- Market concentration and high licence costs make value hard to justify, especially when staff time is lost to context switching.
- Committees want current, local evidence (not historic claims) that functionality and price stand up in public tenders.
- Budget models vary across segments; buyers need transparent pricing and to understand total cost vs alternatives.
How WISEflow Originality responds in practice
- Integrated marking + in‑app reporting reduce overhead; a buyer’s guide articulates total cost and the criteria that matter beyond raw index size.
- Selected via competitive tenders on combined functionality and price - evidence you can cite.
- Transparent pricing models (frameworks and institutional tiers) to match segments, with clear per‑student and annual components.
